CX Insight Magazine

January 2026

The New Human Touch: Re-Earning Trust in the Age of AI

As AI reshapes customer experience, trust, not efficiency, becomes the differentiator.

by Execs In The Know

For the better part of a decade, customer experience (CX) leaders have been asked some version of the same question: Can artificial intelligence (AI) deliver?

Can it reduce friction?
Can it handle volume?
Can it operate at a scale humans simply can’t?

Most organizations now know the answer. AI can deliver, often faster and more consistently than any
human-led system ever could. But a quieter, more important question has emerged in its place, one that
doesn’t show up neatly on a roadmap: Can AI earn trust?

As AI becomes embedded across customerfacing interactions, from chat and voice to personalization engines, recommendations, and automated decisioning, customers are no longer evaluating technology in isolation. They are evaluating the brand judgment behind it.

Every automated interaction is now interpreted as intent, every decision carries meaning, and every moment either reinforces confidence or erodes it. In this new reality, the human touch hasn’t disappeared. It has simply moved upstream, into how experiences are designed, governed, explained, and felt.

They are also the moments where trust is decided.

Trust Has Become the New CX Currency

Customer trust has always mattered, but AI has changed its economics. When trust is broken in a human interaction, the impact is often contained. When trust is broken in an automated one, it scales instantly. One poorly designed workflow can undermine thousands of interactions before anyone realizes what’s gone wrong.

Trust erodes not because AI exists, but because it is applied without balance or choice. Only 32% of consumers believe companies are doing a good job balancing AI-powered and human assistance. And nearly two-thirds say there is too much AI in customer service journeys.1

This is why trust now behaves like a form of currency in CX. It compounds when handled carefully, and it devalues quickly when mishandled. According to the 2024 Edelman Trust Barometer,2 trust now outweighs traditional drivers like price and convenience when customers decide which brands deserve their loyalty.

At the same time, the financial consequences of broken trust are becoming more immediate. PwC’s CX research3 shows that even long-standing brand affinity can be undone by a single experience that feels dismissive, confusing, or misaligned with customer expectations, particularly when technology mediates the interaction. Customers may not articulate this explicitly, but they feel it. And once confidence is lost, it is far harder to recover than it is to measure.

The CX Conversation Has Shifted

In early AI deployments, organizations focused on containment, deflection, and cost-to-serve. The priority was keeping operations moving. Today, that framing feels incomplete. The most forward-looking CX leaders are asking more uncomfortable, and more strategic, questions:

Does this experience reflect how we want customers to feel about us?
Are we transparent enough about how decisions are made?
When something goes wrong, do customers know who, or what, is accountable?
Would we be comfortable explaining this interaction on a main stage?

This is the inflection point. AI is no longer just a back-end efficiency lever; it has become a frontline representative of brand values, and customers are paying attention.

Designing AI Experiences That Customers Can Trust

Trust is rarely built through a single interaction. It is built through consistency, clarity, and restraint over time. Trust-first AI experiences don’t begin with features; they begin with intent. They start by asking: What should a customer reasonably expect from us in this moment?

That expectation shapes everything, from tone and timing to escalation paths and transparency. Customers don’t need every technical detail, but they do need to understand when automation is involved, what it is doing on their behalf, and where the boundaries are. This expectation is increasingly explicit. Salesforce’s State of the Connected Customer research4 shows that a majority of consumers want brands to be transparent about when AI is used and how it influences outcomes. Transparency doesn’t diminish confidence; it reinforces it.

In a recent research report on Ethics, Adoption, and Opinion: Consumer Perspectives on AI for CX,5 72% of consumers believe brands should clearly identify when an interaction is powered by AI. Among customers aged 60-plus, that expectation rises to 83%.

Equally important is emotional context. A billing question after a declined payment carries different emotional weight than a product inquiry during normal business hours. Systems that treat those interactions as equivalent may be efficient, but they feel tone-deaf.

A shipping update checked out of curiosity feels different than one opened after a customer has already rearranged plans. A policy explanation requested during onboarding carries less weight than the same explanation delivered after a denied claim or unexpected charge. A service outage notification read during off-hours is not the same as one encountered mid-task, mid-deadline, or mid-crisis. The brands earning trust are designing AI to recognize context, not just intent, and to default to help rather than deflection when stakes are high.

Efficiency and Empathy Are Not Opposites

One of the most persistent myths in CX is that efficiency and empathy exist in tension with one another. In practice, they are often strongest when designed together. AI excels at pattern recognition, recall, and speed. Humans excel at judgment, emotional nuance, and repair when things go wrong. The most effective CX organizations are not choosing between the two; they are intentionally pairing them.

Execs In The Know’s recent article on agentic AI6 in the contact center outlines a clear human–AI operating model, distinguishing when AI should assist, lead with oversight, or operate autonomously. This reinforces that trust depends on when judgment is handed off, not just whether automation exists.

McKinsey research7 consistently shows that organizations combining AI-driven insights with human judgment outperform automation-only models on customer satisfaction, not just efficiency. When humans remain in the loop, customers feel the difference. The reason is simple: Customers don’t want faster answers at the expense of feeling understood. They want experiences that respect both their time and their emotions.

Yet in practice, many AI deployments stop short of this balance. While AI often optimizes operations, it frequently stalls when it comes to customer trust. The findings in the State of the Tech: AI in the Contact Center report8 show that 53% of CX leaders report no significant improvement in customer satisfaction (CSAT) after implementing AI and only six percent say AI has greatly increased CSAT, despite widespread productivity gains.

Re-Training Teams for AI-Assisted Emotional Intelligence

Technology transformations often focus heavily on tools and insufficiently on people. AI changes the nature of frontline work, but it doesn’t remove the need for human judgment. In fact, it raises the bar to maintain it. Agents today are being asked to interpret AI-generated insights, assess their relevance, and decide when to follow them, and when not to. This requires a new kind of skill set: AI-assisted emotional intelligence.

It’s the ability to understand how recommendations are generated without treating them as absolutes. It’s knowing when automation has missed something subtle and stepping in with empathy. It’s maintaining an authentic human voice even when supported by machine intelligence. Leading organizations are investing in training that demystifies AI rather than positioning it as an authority. When agents understand how systems work, they are better equipped to use them responsibly, and to challenge them when needed. That confidence translates directly to customer trust.

According to Accenture,9 consumers who trust companies are 54% more likely to buy again. Yet, only 39% trust companies to have good intentions, and 43% trust their claims.

Measuring Trust

If trust is the outcome, measurement has to evolve. Traditional metrics like handle time and containment still matter, but they tell only part of the story. They don’t capture how customers feel during automated interactions, or whether confidence is building or eroding over time.

Many CX leaders are expanding their measurement frameworks to include sentiment shifts, friction at handoff points, and customer confidence indicators following AI-mediated interactions. Gartner predicts10 that in 2026, most CX organizations will move away from traditional satisfaction surveys in favor of real-time sentiment and behavioral analytics, reflecting a broader shift toward measuring trust as it evolves.

Trust is not static; it changes with every interaction. And increasingly, AI makes those moments visible if organizations choose to measure them.

Governance Is a CX Responsibility

As AI influences more customer-facing decisions, governance can no longer sit exclusively with legal, compliance, or IT teams. Trust-first organizations treat governance as part of the CX operating model. That means defining accountability for automated decisions, auditing for bias regularly, and establishing clear escalation paths for edge cases where ethical judgment is required.

World Economic Forum research highlights11 this tension, with a significant share of consumers expressing concern about bias and misuse in AI-driven services, particularly in regulated and highstakes industries.

Customers may not frame these concerns in technical language, but they feel the impact when systems behave unfairly or inconsistently. Governance, in this context, is not about slowing innovation. It is about protecting credibility at scale.

Hyper-Personalization Under the Trust Microscope

Few areas of AI create more tension than personalization. When done well, personalization saves time, reduces effort, and makes customers feel known. When done poorly, it feels intrusive, unsettling, and overly familiar.

Customers value relevance, but only when personalization feels ethical, transparent, and genuinely helpful. The difference often comes down to agency.

Do customers understand why they are seeing certain recommendations? Can they control how their data is used? Does personalization feel like support, or surveillance? The answers to those questions determine whether personalization builds trust or quietly undermines it.

Personalization as Empowerment

Trust-centered personalization is not about how much data a brand can gather, but how intentionally it chooses to use it. It is grounded in restraint and respect, favoring opt-in models over inference, explaining value in plain language, and giving customers real agency rather than hiding controls in fine print or fragmented settings. When personalization is designed this way, it feels less like targeting and more like service. T

he most trusted brands resist the temptation to know everything. Instead, they focus on knowing what genuinely matters in the moment and being explicit about where the line is drawn. They communicate not only what data is used, but why, and just as importantly, what is deliberately left unused. In an era where AI makes nearly anything technically possible, trust is often built through judgment: the conscious decisions organizations make about when not to personalize, when not to predict, and when to leave space for the customer to lead.

The New Human Touch

I has changed the mechanics of CX, but it hasn’t rewritten the emotional contract customers expect brands to honor. They still want to feel respected. They still want clarity when something goes wrong. And they still want confidence that someone, human or machine, is acting in their best interest, not simply following a script.

What will distinguish the next generation of CX leaders is not how quickly or broadly they deploy AI, but how deliberately they embed it into systems of judgment, accountability, and care. The new human touch is not a retreat from technology. It is the discipline of designing trust into every interaction, upstream, by default, and on purpose long before a customer ever becomes aware of the machine behind it.

That expectation is already here. And increasingly, it is the standard by which customers decide which brands are worth their loyalty and which are not.

Article Links:

  1. https://execsintheknow.com/knowledge-center/customer-experience-research/hot-topics-research/ethics-adoption-and-opinion-consumer-perspectives-on-ai-for-cx/
  2. https://www.edelman.com/trust/2024/trust-barometer
  3. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/services/consulting/business-transformation/future-customer-experience-is-supply-chain.html
  4. https://www.salesforce.com/en-us/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/documents/research/State-of-the-Connected-Customer.pdf
  5. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketingand-sales/our-insights/unlocking-the-next-frontier-of-personalized-marketing
  6. https://execsintheknow.com/knowledge-center/customer-experience-research/hot-topics-research/state-of-thetech-ai-in-the-contact-center/
  7. https://execsintheknow.com/knowledge-center/customer-experience-research/hot-topics-research/state-of-thetech-ai-in-the-contact-center/
  8. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-10-21-gartner-unveils-top-predictions-for-it-organizations-and-users-in-2026-and-beyond
  9. https://www.accenture.com/content/dam/accenture/final/accenture-com/document-2/Accenture-The-Empowered-Consumer.pdf
  10. https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Transforming_Consumer_Industries_in_the_Age_of_AI_2025.pdf